![]() Thank you for the feedback, Sam! It’s never possible to proofread your own work and find all of the errors (I did try). Looking forward to seeing what you tackle next though! Fan noise is the bane of my own recording existence. Saves you having to deal with substring and let’s Javascript do the heavy lifting for you.Īn alternative trick is to check if the string has a length and append the join characters in the middle after the first iteration of the loop: if (current_chores.length) current_chores += ", " Ĭurrent_chores += chores.getFieldValue(chore_id) įor the audio it sounds like fan noise, try grabbing Audacity and using it’s noise reduction plugin on the audio to see if it can clean it up. Instead of doing string concatenation, I’d use an array and join: let current_chores = Ĭurrent_chores.push(chores.getFieldValue(chore_id)) Ī similar one solution would work for the name list as well which would make it easy to prefix or suffix titles, add middle names or more. Google and V8 drove that optimisation which meant everyone else (including Apple) picked it up. length property is generally cached these days by the runtime. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s not coerced to a boolean before being marshalled back to Objective-C.įor Section 7, the. ![]() It’s a slightly different approach than class based object orientated programming hierarchies.įor Section 6, why did you pick the basic loop over the child records loop? As an aside third parameter comment is probably more correct than wrong because of the way Javascript treats falsey types. Javascript is also generally referred to as a prototype based language and as such doesn’t have classes, just objects that you can extend upon (in a sense they’re all just dictionaries with some self referential sugar). Additionally console.log will return to you the value of the property, for built-ins it’ll be a wrapper around native code though pure Javascript functions will return the implementation. Minor bug on the functions page, you reference console_log not console.log. Perhaps you’ll end up writing “Tap Forms 5: The Missing Manual” at the end of it all. Look forward to seeing more expansion here though! Walk through guides for Tap Forms is something that I feel is missing but could be very useful. ![]() Love the styling on the pages though I would have liked a more obvious “next” button to go to the next section. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |